Skip to content

Tuorui "v1ncent19" Peng

En voyage dans l'espace de Hilbert.

Mathematics & Statistics≈ 2 min readEnglish

Proof Two Properties of Log-Likelihood

§Likelihood Function, Score and Fisher Information

Given data D={x}i=1N\mathcal{D}=\{x\}_{i=1}^N and statistics model X∼F={f(x;θ):θ∈Θ} X\sim \mathscr{F} = \{ f(x;\theta ):\theta \in\Theta \}. Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) is an important approach to estimation of θ\theta , in which likelihood function and log-likelihood are defined as:

L(θ;D)=∏i=1Nf(xi;θ),ℓ(θ;D)=log⁡L(θ;D)=∑i=1Nlog⁡f(xi;θ)\begin{align} L(\theta;\mathcal{D} )=\prod_{i=1}^N f(x_i;\theta ),\qquad \ell(\theta ;\mathcal{D})=\log L(\theta;\mathcal{D} )=\sum_{i=1}^N \log f(x_i;\theta ) \end{align}

Score Function is derivative of log-likelihood:

S(θ):=∂ℓ(θ)∂θ\begin{align} S(\theta ):=\dfrac{\partial^{} \ell(\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{}} \end{align}

Fisher Information is the expectation of squared score:

I(θ):=E(∂ℓ∂θ∂ℓ∂θT)\begin{align} I(\theta ):=\mathbb{E}\left( \dfrac{\partial^{} \ell}{\partial \theta ^{}}\dfrac{\partial^{} \ell}{\partial \theta ^{T}}\right) \end{align}

§Property 1: Ex[S(θ;x)∣θ]=0\mathbb{E}_x[S(\theta;x )|\theta ]=0

proof:

Ex(S∣θ)=∫f(x⃗;θ)∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ dx⃗=∫f(x⃗;θ)1f(x⃗;θ)∂f(x⃗;θ)∂θ dx⃗=∂∂θ∫f(x⃗;θ) dx⃗=∂∂θ1=0\begin{align} \mathbb{E}_x(S|\theta)=&\int f(\vec{x};\theta ) \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{}} \,\mathrm{d}\vec{x}\\ =&\int f(\vec{x};\theta )\dfrac{1}{f(\vec{x};\theta )}\dfrac{\partial^{}f(\vec{x};\theta ) }{\partial \theta ^{}} \,\mathrm{d}\vec{x}\\ =&\dfrac{\partial^{} }{\partial \theta ^{}}\int f(\vec{x};\theta ) \,\mathrm{d}\vec{x}=\dfrac{\partial^{} }{\partial \theta ^{}}1=0 \end{align}

Comment: It means that for data D\mathcal{D} generated from the model f(x;θ)f(x;\theta ), the data points would distribute in a pattern 'around' S(θ;x)=0S(\theta ;x)=0. Thus by looking for θ^=arg⁡θ(S(θ;x)=0)\hat{\theta }=\mathop{\arg} \limits_{\theta }\left(S(\theta ;x)=0 \right) could help find the parameter that generated the data.


§Property 2: I(θ)=Ex(∂ℓ∂θ∂ℓ∂θT)=−Ex[∂2ℓ∂θ∂θT]I(\theta )=\mathbb{E}_x\left( \dfrac{\partial^{} \ell}{\partial \theta ^{}}\dfrac{\partial^{} \ell}{\partial \theta ^{T}}\right)=-\mathbb{E}_x\left[ \dfrac{\partial^{2} \ell}{\partial \theta \partial \theta ^T}\right]

proof:

0=∂∂θTEx(S∣θ)=∫∂∂θT{∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θf(x⃗;θ)} dx⃗=∫{∂2ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂θTf(x⃗;θ)+∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂f(x⃗;θ)∂θT} dx⃗=∫∂2ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂θTf(x⃗;θ) dx⃗+∫∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θTf(x⃗;θ) dx⃗=E(∂2ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂θT)+E(∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θT)⇒I(θ)=E(∂2ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂θT)=−E(∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θ∂ln⁡f(x⃗;θ)∂θT) \begin{align} 0&=\dfrac{\partial^{} }{\partial \theta ^{T}}\mathbb{E}_x(S|\theta )\\ &=\int\dfrac{\partial^{} }{\partial \theta ^{T}} \left\{\dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta ) }{\partial \theta ^{}} f(\vec{x};\theta )\right\}\,\mathrm{d}\vec{x}\\ &=\int \left\{ \dfrac{\partial^{2} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta \partial \theta ^{T}} f(\vec{x};\theta )+\dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{}} \dfrac{\partial^{} f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{T}} \right\} \,\mathrm{d}\vec{x} \\ &=\int \dfrac{\partial^{2} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta \partial \theta ^{T}} f(\vec{x};\theta ) \,\mathrm{d}\vec{x} +\int \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{}} \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta^{T}} f(\vec{x};\theta )\,\mathrm{d} \vec{x}\\ &=\mathbb{E}\left( \dfrac{\partial^{2} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta \partial \theta ^{T}}\right)+\mathbb{E}\left( \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{}} \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{T}} \right)\\ \Rightarrow &I(\theta )= \mathbb{E}\left( \dfrac{\partial^{2} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta \partial \theta ^{T}}\right)=-\mathbb{E}\left( \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{}} \dfrac{\partial^{} \ln f(\vec{x};\theta )}{\partial \theta ^{T}} \right) \end{align}

Comment: Information is the (negative) second derivative. It could be a measure of accuracy of estimator, in terms of maxizing ℓ(θ)\ell(\theta ), i.e. the information contained in the estimator.